Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they package it, and how readily it is accepted. Underlying this disagreement, however, is a common assumption that social forces are a source of bias and irrationality. Longino challenges this assumption, arguing that social interaction actually assists us in securing firm, rationally based knowledge. This important insight allows her to develop a durable and novel account of scientific knowledge that integrates the social and cognitive. Longino begins with a detailed discussion of a wide range of contemporary thinkers who write on scientific knowledge, clarifying the philosophical points at issue. She then critically analyzes the dichotomous understanding of the rational and the social that characterizes both sides of the science studies stalemate and the social account that she sees as necessary for an epistemology of science that includes the full spectrum of cognitive processes. Throughout, her account is responsive both to the normative uses of the term knowledge and to the social conditions in which scientific knowledge is produced. Building on ideas first advanced in her influential book Science as Social Knowledge, Longino brings her account into dialogue with current work in social epistemology and science studies and shows how her critical social approach can help solve a variety of stubborn problems. While the book focuses on epistemological concerns related to the sociality of inquiry, Longino also takes up its implications for scientific pluralism. The social approach, she concludes, best allows us to retain a meaningful concept of knowledge in the face of theoretical plurality and uncertainty.
Este sitio web utiliza cookies propias y de terceros para analizar nuestros servicios y mostrarte publicidad relacionada con tus preferencias, en base a un perfil elaborado a partir de tus hábitos de navegación (por ejemplo, páginas visitadas). Si continúas navegando, consideraremos que aceptas su uso. Puedes configurar o rechazar la utilización de cookies u obtener más información aquí
Más información sobre el uso de "cookies" y sus opciones de privacidad
Este sitio web utiliza cookies tanto propias como de terceros para recabar y tratar su información con las finalidades que se detallan a continuación en el panel de configuración.
A través del mismo, puede aceptar o rechazar de forma diferenciada el uso de cookies, que están clasificadas en función del servicio. En cada uno de ellos encontrará información adicional sobre sus cookies. Puede encontrar más información en la Política de cookies.
Estrictamente necesarias (técnicas):
Se usan para actividades que son estrictamente necesarias para gestionar o prestar el servicio que usted nos ha solicitado y, por tanto, no exigen su consentimiento.
Google Analytics
Google Analytics es una herramienta de analítica web de la empresa Google. Ofrece información agrupada del tráfico que llega a los sitios web según la audiencia, la adquisición, el comportamiento y las conversiones que se llevan a cabo en el sitio web. Es una herramienta utilizada en marketing digital.